Yet another reason to hate football

Rush Limbaugh on black Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb:

I think what we’ve had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn’t deserve. The defense carried this team.

McNabb, naturally, didn’t take kindly to the comments, and neither did the usual suspects, who called for ESPN to fire Limbaugh from their Sunday NFL pre-game show. They didn’t. He resigned, instead, saying a statement that his comments weren’t “racially motivated,” but I think that’s a crock.

The only reason for Limbaugh to speculate that “the media” overhyped McNabb because of his skin color is because he subconsciously believes that there’s still some doubt about blacks’ ability to peform as NFL quarterbacks.

Why would “the media” need to hype McNabb, given that there are several successful starting NFL QBs out there already — Michael Vick, Steve McNair, Kordell Stewart (OK, he has been successful) and Daunte Culpepper, to name a few. Randall Cunningham and Warren Moon are just two of the great retired black QBs.

So there would be no need for “the media” to overhype McNabb any more than they do with any other quarterback. NFL QBs usually get too much credit for their teams’ successes and too much blame for their failures — that’s true regardless of skin color.

How that thought could even occur to Limbaugh is because he, at some level, has some doubt about blacks’ ability to perform as QBs that would somehow necessitate the naturally liberal-minded news media to shade the facts to favor an African-American like McNabb under some kind of secret sports affirmative action program.

It was a stupid thing to say, but perhaps not as stupid as having Limbaugh on the ESPN show in the first place. He has no football expertise or experience. He’s never coached or played the game. He was on there to generate excitement and unfortunately he generated a little too much excitement for ESPN.

If ESPN is so badly struggling for ratings that it resorts to these kinds of stunts — hiring Limbaugh, I mean — well maybe football fans aren’t interested in watching eight hours of pre-game coverage. But on that I could only hazard a guess, not being a football fan myself.

Out of Atlanta

In spite of yesterday’s disappointing loss, the Cubs still got out of Atlanta with a 1-1 split.

It’s true the Cubs failed to convert on many opportunities, leaving seven runners on base, not to mention Randall Simon’s boneheaded baserunning in the eighth inning. But there are a lot of good signs coming out of these first two games.

First, these Cubs are not the patsies of 1998. They have the outstanding starting pitching to keep them in the games in spite of the lack of offensive pop. Wood obviously was phenomenal and Zambrano kept the Cubs in it in spite of being too high in the zone with a lot of his pitches and making a few mistakes. The much-feared Zambrano meltdown did not happen.

The Cubs failed to convert a bunch of scoring opportunities, but the good news is that they had scoring opportunities. They’ve showed a lot of patience so far, taking 13 walks. Sosa, in particular, has made himself a factor by refusing to swing at the high fastballs and low-and-away breaking balls that he simply cannot hit. I also think it’s a great sign that the Cubs were able to tie it up against Smoltz, proving to themselves that it’s not “game over” when he comes in to close it.

In other words, some losses hurt more than others. At least the Cubs did not lose a crushing hearbreaker like last night’s Red Sox 12th-inning loss to the A’s on a bases loaded squeeze play.

And Dusty’s not the only one who feels good about coming back home with Mark Prior going in game three. Prior is to Cubs wins what Estes is to Cubs losses. He’s almost an automatic W. This Braves offense is clearly containable, and Maddux is hittable. Ortiz has been announced for game four, which I think is good news. He wriggled off the hook several times in game one and, if the Cubs stay patient, can be knocked out early.

He will be going on three days’ rest against a fresh Matt Clement. Given the matchups and the fact the Cubs really should have won both games, I think they’ve got a great chance to end this series in Wrigley. And in spite of the great turnout at Wrigely South — er, Turner Field — I think we’d all be happy to wait ’til next year to hear that damn song again.

Toot, toot

My latest story to see print in Insurance Journal is on the much-ballyhooed do-not-fax rule.

A little news on the IJ front, by the way, is that the magazine is “going national” beginning January 2004. This national presence will include three new regional editions — Northeast, Southeast and Midwest. Yours truly has been named managing editor of the Midwest edition, meaning I’ll be in charge of the regional “wrap” around the national content shared across all editions.

It should be fun and a challenge. It will keep me busy, but that’s a good thing.

I’ve also tentatively agreed to revive the Free-Market.Net Policy Spotlight, formerly written by the very talented J.D. Tuccille, on a freelance basis. I’m doing it on a monthly basis to start, and my first spotlight takes aim at the federal government’s “Budget Bulge.”

It pays to be an alderman

The Sun-Times’ Fran Spielman reports:

Chicago aldermen who will pass judgment on the expansion of Wrigley Field and the Cubs’ request for more night games have each been offered a pair of playoff tickets for as long as the Cubs stay alive.

Scalpers are charging anywhere from $300 to $1,500 a ticket for Games 3 and 4 of the Cubs’ divisional playoff series against Atlanta. Aldermen will pay face value of $35 per ticket for upper box seats.

But don’t worry, it’s just a “courtesy gesture” and “has nothing to do with politics,” according to 44th Ward Alderman Tom Tunney, who’s been leading the fight to get the Cubs permission to play 12 more night games at Wrigley.

Not only have the Cubs finally figured out a winning formula on the field, it looks like they’re on the ball when it comes to prevailing in the political game.

Rooting interests

Obviously, I’m rooting for the Cubbies. Aside from that, here’s where my heart will be in the divisional round of the baseball playoffs.

American League

  • Twins vs. Yankees: Well, duh. I will be rooting for the Twins, of course. Not only are they un-evil, but they helped humiliate the White Sox. The Yankees are heavily favored but the Twins are one of the hottest teams in baseball. They find ways to win.
  • Red Sox vs. A’s: Red Sox, of course. This may be the premier match-up in the divisional round, featuring the Red Sox high-powered offense versus the A’s great pitching. Much will depend on how the starters other than Martinez perform for the Red Sox, and whether they can keep their bullpen from imploding. If the Cubs don’t win it all, I hope the Red Sox do.

National League

  • Giants vs. Marlins: Giants. Bonds deserves a World Series championship capper to his career. If the Cubs and BoSox fall by the wayside, I want the Giants to win it. I especially fear that I’ll be rooting extra hard for them against the Braves in the LCS if they get past the Cubs. As for this series, the Marlins have been one of the hottest teams in baseball since Jack McKeon took over as manager, but the Giants have been almost unbeatable at home and have home-field advantage. I think the Giants will take it.

Goodbye, Gracie

Mark Grace announced his retirement the other day. He was, for years, my favorite Cub. He didn’t have all the tools (power and speed being his primary deficiencies), but the tools he did possess he employed just about as well as anyone.

He had a good eye at the plate and seemingly never wasted an at-bat. Even if a pitcher got him out, it was always a headache. He fouled off pitch after pitch after pitch … after pitch and then took one an inch outside on the corner. Grace could go the other way and could turn on a ball inside. The man was a doubles machine — 510 in all.

In the field he was just as great, digging countless balls out of the dirt. Who knows how many errors he saved Cubs shortstops over the years, winning four gold gloves. He didn’t have the power you expect from a first baseman, but he left the home run hitting to Sosa.

I’ll always remember his performance in the 1989 playoffs on the Cubs’ last division-winning team. He went 11-for-17 with one home run, three doubles, a triple, eight RBI and four walks. Amazing stuff.

It’s a shame he wasn’t surrounded with better players during his years with the Cubs. He and Sosa were the constants. Which is why it was so wonderful to see him win the World Series with the Diamondbacks, which was (just about) the most gratifying sporting event I’ve ever seen. Hopefully it will soon be complemented by a Cubs’ World Series win. And a Red Sox championship … next year.

In his retirement announcement Grace said, “Chicago, thank you for 13 fabulous years. If we’re not going to be in it this year, believe me, I’m pullin’ for you guys.”

Thanks, Gracie. It was always easy to pull for you.

Congrats, Ronnie!

I was surprised by how composed and articulate Ron Santo was in the pre-game number retirement ceremony today. I thought for sure he’d break down two or three times trying to get through it. But he did a great job. It was very moving.

And he predicted the Cubs would go “all the way,” so it must be.

Santo was my dad’s favorite player, and it’s easy to see why. He played with passion and overcame the diabetes he grew up with and played with every day of his career. And perhaps this is just the emotion of the day talking here, but I think Santo means more to Cubs fans than the two other living greats whose numbers fly on the foul poles in Wrigley, Ernie Banks and Billy Williams.

While Williams is greatly respected and admired by Cubs fans, I don’t think he is beloved as such. The real competition here is Ernie Banks, long known as “Mr. Cub.” In a way, his eternally optimistic and upbeat “Let’s play two” attitude represented everything wrong with the Chicago Cubs organization for so many years. It was enough to have a beautiful ballpark and hit a home run or two.

While I don’t know enough about Ernie Banks to speculate about his inner desire to win, the image he presented to the public was that of a happy-go-lucky who wanted to lead the Cubs to greatness, sure, but was just as happy winning back-to-back MVP awards for second-division teams in 1958 and 1958. “Mr. Cub,” if not Ernie Banks, represents the Cubs’ history of complacency.

Santo, on the other hand, represents the intense, burning fire every real Cubs’ fan feels to see them become champions. Not just once, but for a decade. Cubs fans deserve not just a winner, but a dynasty. Santo played that way, and I think it’s clear from his emotional reactions as a color analyst on WGN radio that he still feels that way.

Retiring Santo’s number now, instead of waiting for his eventual enshrinement in the Hall of Fame, may perhaps symbolize the Cubs organization’s rededication to building that dynasty we all so badly want to see.

You gotta be in it to win it

I walked Sport tonight and it was a pleasure to feel the brisk, chilly late September air against my skin and know … the Cubs are still in it.

I wouldn’t dare to predict how far the Cubs will get in the playoffs. Especially in a best-of-five, it’s kind of a crapshoot. Let’s say that the Cubs will definitely have to earn a trip to the league championship series, having to go through Atlanta, the team with the best record in baseball this year.

What gives the Cubs a chance is their starting pitching. Thanks to the clincher on Saturday, Wood will start game one and, if necessary, game five. Zambrano, Prior and Clement would each get one start in a five-game series.

It’s impossible to predict how effective each pitcher will be against the power-packed Braves, but there is at least a good chance the starters will keep the Cubs in each and every game. And if you stay close, there’s no telling what could happen.

The Braves have to be the favorite in the series, but then again it looked like the Astros were favored too. And the Braves appeared to be the favorite last year in the first round against the Giants, then led by … Dusty Baker.

A must win

As incredible a turnaround as these last two days have been up to this point (just before game two of the doubleheader starts), I think it’s crucial to the Cubs’ playoff hopes that they win this game.

With Zambrano’s status unclear, the Cubs rotation would be spotty to start a series against offensively powered Atlanta — just when they need it to be its strongest.

So if Clement can carry the Cubs to victory now, Wood doesn’t need to go tomorrow and can start game one of the playoffs Tuesday night. Starting off strong could go a long way toward making up for weak starters in game two and/or three in that short first-round series.

Winning the division, period, would be wonderful — of course! But winning it today would give the Cubs a much better chance to compete in the playoffs and go who knows how deep into October.

Go Cubs!

And thank you, Brewers! Thank you, Scott Podsednik; thank you, Wes Obermueller.

Sorry, Karen! It ain’t over yet, baby.