9/11 reform is a joke

Does anyone seriously believe that promoting the ineffectual Office of Homeland Security to cabinet department-level status will make a difference? Cato’s Ivan Eland calmly and coolly obliterates the arguments for a Homeland Security Department in this Newsday op-ed. Eland concludes:

Consolidating even more numerous disparate and sometimes dysfunctional agencies into a new department is likely to result in the same problems and a burgeoning secretarial bureaucracy to attempt to control the whole unwieldy cacophony.

Uh-huh. Dubya just wants something done. It’s the story of his entire presidency — appearance over substance. But I suppose that should not come as a surprise, except to conservatives who actually thought it made a difference whether Gush or Bore was elected.

Julian donkeyboy

So I finally met up with longtime Internet buddy Julian Sanchez last night after work. I met him at a bar called Stoney’s and he introduced me to a bunch of folks from Cato, including Jerry Brito and Gene Healy.

Then we split up for a while and I met Julian and his girlfriend later on at a party at the home (I guess) of Kevin B. Zeese, president of Common Sense for Drug Policy. You’ve probably seen their ads in public affairs magazines like Reason, The New Republic, National Review, etc.

I used the downstairs bathroom and Zeese had a very funny sign posted right above the toilet: “Certified Urine Drug Tester,” or something to that effect. It was a legit poster, too — I imagine a friend got it for him as a practical joke. I don’t recall the exact wording. Anyway, I met a bunch of Koch fellows there, as well as LP campus coordinator Marc Brandl, for whom I can’t locate a Web site at just the moment. All were very friendly and we had some fun conversation and a few beers, too, of course.

Then I took a cab home and went to some parties around the dorms at Alumni Square here in Georgetown, which naturally weren’t as libertarian-infested and therefore less interesting.

Hmph. I might go to this. I am free Wednesday night.

So far, so humid

Actually, the weather has been refreshing the last couple of days — in the 70s and low 80s with grey skies and light showers. So it’s been much more tolerable than it was before. Unfortunately, there are no 24-hour labs here as I thought. Well, I guess the labs are theoretically open, but you are supposed to swipe the GoCard through this machine for the door to open. But we have the new and improved GoCard which, apparently, does not work with any of the old and still unimproved card-reading machines.

Which means I’m more or less limited to the library for blogging. And they’re closing off access to the computers at least at 5:30 p.m. There are these three Macs in the student center which doesn’t close until midnight, but you have to stand up to to use them, and with only three they are occupied much more often, naturally.

So far, work has been fun. Working at KRT is kind of a meritocracy. The editors aren’t going to say, “No, don’t work on that — we don’t have space,” because it’s a wire service and they can move as much copy as they want on to the wire. But it’s a meritocracy because however good or timely your story is determines whether it gets picked up by the member papers.

So I’m pretty sure I had a story about Senate Democrats attacking Bush’s Social Security plan published yesterday, but I have to look it up on Lexis-Nexis to make sure, as KRT does not track its stories.

And I’m working on four or five other stories right now and also wrote a couple of very brief Web site reviews for this “Hotlink” feature they run.

As for classes … they’re three-hour lectures, and they’re tough. Tuesday and Thursday nights from 6 to 9 p.m. I have economics class. That’s after an 8-hour working day. And these are lectures, all the way through. The chairs are uncomfortable and there’s no time to eat or change into comfortable clothing after work. Those 12-hour days are killer.

Meanwhile, on Wednesday morning we have a guest speaker or speakers every week, followed by a three-hour class in ethics. That’s pretty brutal. So I have no energy to do any reading for class during the week, which means I’ve got to do it all on the weekend, in addition to laundry, shopping, etc.

Jeez, don’t I have it terrible? And here I thought all those kids dying of AIDS in sub-saharan Africa were badly off.

Here’s an interesting tidbit. The boss of one of my roommates, Daniel Epstein (who’s from Houston, by the way) , apparently started the IPJ program and he told Daniel that pretty much everyone who applied was accepted. No surprise, really. I always thought the application process was a little less than rigorous.

Once you’re here, though, they wear you ragged. We are told repeatedly that these seven weeks will just fly by. Well, it’s just more than a week since I’ve arrived and it feels like two or three. So I hope it does start flying by soon. I want to get back home.

Democrats assail Bush’s Social Security proposal

WASHINGTON — Warming up what will likely be an oft-heard campaign theme this fall, Senate Democrats on Thursday attacked President Bush’s Social Security reform proposal to allow individuals to invest a part of their payroll taxes in the stock market.

In a letter to President Bush signed by 49 Senate Democrats and independent Sen. James Jeffords of Vermont, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and Sen. Jon Corzine of New Jersey charged that Bush’s plan would "substantially reduce the level of guaranteed Social Security benefits."

John Breaux of Louisiana was the only Senate Democrat not signing the letter.

There will be a 9 percent cut in guaranteed benefits by 2012 under the Bush plan and as much as a 45 percent cut by 2075, according to actuarial estimates by the Social Security Administration.

"Privatization is wrong," Daschle said at a news conference on Capitol Hill. "Social Security should be a guarantee, not a gamble."

A call to the White House press office for a reaction was not returned.

The Daschle and Corzine letter also asked the president to demonstrate his opposition to benefit cuts by repudiating the privatization reforms proposed by the Social Security commission he appointed last year.

"We think this is an important issue to be discussed before the election as a part of the agenda that the American people consider when they go to the polls this fall," Corzine said.

"The word ‘security’ in Social Security was intended to guarantee a floor," said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich. "There were not going to be winners and losers when it comes to Social Security, but when it comes to privatization, there are going to be losers."

Congressional Republicans countered that ignoring the looming Social Security crisis could lead to benefit cuts of 33 percent and payroll taxes of more than 50 percent.

"Senate Democrats continue using Social Security as a political battering ram to hide the fact they have no plan to strengthen Social Security," responded Rep. E. Clay Shaw Jr., a Florida Republican.

A Gallup poll released this month showed that 43 percent of Americans think Democrats would do a better job of dealing with Social Security, compared to only 33 percent for the GOP.

However, 55 percent of Americans told National Public Radio pollsters in March that they agreed with allowing individuals to invest a part of their Social Security contributions in the stock market, while 40 percent disagreed.

Senate Democrats are being shortsighted about the risks of the stock market, said Matt Moore, a policy analyst for the conservative National Center for Policy Analysis. While the rate of return from Social Security is only 2 percent, the stock market has averaged a 6.4 percent return over any 35-year period in the last 128 years, he said.

"The attacks they’re making are a distraction from the real issues," Moore said. "In 15 years they’re not going to have enough money to pay the funds. So we need to have an honest and open dialogue. You’ve got to have two sides talking. Only one side has proposed a solution."

When asked about alternatives to Bush’s plan, Levin advocated a bipartisan commission like the one formed in 1982 and headed by current Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan. By contrast, Bush’s commission "was clearly tilted toward those who favor privatization," Levin said.

That Bush selected people who agreed with him should come as no surprise, said Michael Tanner, a Social Security expert at the libertarian Cato Institute, from which three commission members and one staffer were drawn.

Tanner also said that in criticizing the Bush proposal’s cuts, Senate Democrats neglected to include the benefits individuals would be receiving from their individual retirement accounts.

"Under all the reform plans, benefits provided by the federal government are reduced, but you get money from your individual account," Tanner said.

"The Bush administration is trying to create the fiction that Social Security’s broken and needs to be fixed, when in fact the opposite is true," said Sen. Mark Dayton, D-Minn., who was also at the briefing.

"Social Security is in good shape for the next three to four decades, depending on the economy, and it’s only their actions that threaten to break it sooner," he said.

Tanner disagreed, arguing that Social Security benefits are threatened by a $24 trillion unfunded liability over a 75-year actuarial period. He added that there is nothing to prevent Congress from decreasing benefits or increasing taxes to keep the system solvent.

Levin said Social Security is a "huge, significant, critical, fundamental issue," which should be debated, not "delayed until after the campaign, as the president desires."
___
© 2002, McClatchy/Tribune Information Services

Down to the wire

So, IPJ finally told us about our internship assignments today. I will be working at Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services, a leading wire service that provides content to more than 365 newspapers aorund the country.

I’m not sure yet what I’ll be doing there, exactly, but all in all it sounds like a sweet gig. It’s certainly no Hog Farmer Quarterly.

By the way, the roommate whose internship with the International Fresh-cut Producers Association freaked me out actually got precisely the assignment he wanted. His major is something called agricultural marketing communications, and this gig is right up his alley. So good for him — and for me.

The folks I’ve met so far are very friendly, and my roommates are amiable fellows as well. Though, presumably, one should wait more than two days before judging the matter, as surely some bitterness of one kind or another will bubble up sooner or later.

They weren’t kidding about the humidity here. Luckily, I had the opportunity to appreciate the midday sun for more than an hour, as I waited in an unshaded, outdoor line to get my Georgetown University ID card, which inevitably has a stupid name. It’s called the GoCard. Whatever.

There are labs here open 24 hours a day, so that should give me plenty of time to blog, once I figure out how to log on to the system using the new password I was just given. Until then.

Oops! The Cap’n did it again

Whether or not you like Cap’n Crunch Oops! All Berries, it’s pretty sensible that an accident at Crunch HQ actually resulted in the cereal. This is manifestly not the case with the Cap’n’s latest “mistake,” Oops! Choco Donuts.

You see, Cap’n Crunchberries were first introduced in 1967. They are a mixture of the regular yellowish things (biscuits, apparently) with some red things that are flavored like berries. But then, in 1997, there was a terrible accident. According to the Cap’n Crunch FAQ, it went down like this:

Despite popular belief, ‘Oops! All Berries’ did not come from an incident at Crunch Headquarters with some mischievous kids. This flavor actually stemmed out of the Capn’s promotion to Admiral. When the Cap’n was promoted, the Quaker Oats Company had to find new Capn’s to fill the positions vacated by the newly promoted Admiral Crunch.

During training at Crunch Headquarters, two new Capn’s — Cap’n Scrinch and Cap’n Munch — were trying to learn how to man the Crunch Berrie and Crunch Biscuit mixing machine that put the two flavors together in the Crunch Berries boxes. While trying to impress Admiral Crunch, they fought over the control handles, breaking them, and creating Cereal Boxes with JUST Berries. Thankfully, the Admiral had his Art Department slap together a box front for the new cereal, which is now enjoyed by millions.

Sure, it’s a little convoluted, but in the end this story makes some sense. In case you were wondering, the Admiral Crunch referred to above is the same guy as Cap’n Crunch. Apparently he was promoted to admiral after years of complaints from fans. It was this very accident that convinced him to resume his post as captain and, hence, a more hands-on role.

So now that the Cap’n is back on the scene, what kind of accident could possibly result in Oops! Choco Donuts? There’s nothing even close to chocolate donuts in any of the other Cap’n Crunch cereals. Certainly, you wouldn’t think that the folks working at Crunch HQ would be eating chocolate donuts for breakfast on the job. Even if they were, there wouldn’t be enough for a whole box of cereal, not to mention millions of boxes. And no broken lever could turn a box of regular Cap’n Crunch into a box of miniature chocolate donuts.

I suppose this shouldn’t come as a surprise. Cap’n Crunch history is filled with weirdness, such as his long battle against the Soggies. Naturally, I’m not the first person to complain about this sad, inexplicable and indefensible turn of events.

Mr. O’Reilly goes to Washington

As I just mentioned, I’m leaving for D.C. on Saturday, and I’ll be there through the end of July. Between classes, internship work and no PC in the dorm room where I’ll be living, the blog should slow down quite a bit. But do check in, as I plan to write about how things are going as well as whatever news catches my eye.

Hog Farmer Quarterly? If I’m lucky

So, you’ll recall that one of my reservations about doing the Institute on Political Journalism program was that I really didn’t know how good of an internship I’d get in D.C. Though I leave for the program on Saturday and classes start on Monday, I still have not been told about my internship placement.

But I’ve been in touch with one of my roommates who is also in IPJ and he said he’ll be working for the International Fresh-cut Producers Association. No joke. This is not to say that I expected to be working at the Washington Post or anything ridiculous like that, but I’m hoping for something better than to work for a lobbying group.

I also don’t mean to suggest that it won’t still be a valuable learning experience no matter where I work. At this point, I’m not in a position to turn down any writing experience, especially trade or business-related work which could come in handy when looking for a job here in Chicago.

But there’s a question of alternatives. I had other choices. I just hope this wasn’t a mistake.

Overheard conversation

I was in the Walgreens buying some things and two men who were price checking with those handheld machines were working near the checkout counter. One said to the other, “So what happened with that whole Enron thing? Did they just cheat everybody out of their money or what?”

His partner answered noncommittally. But boy could they operate those machines, typing in numbers a gazillion miles a minute without even looking at the keypad. A perfect example of rational ignorance, which is both a blessing and a curse. And to think that I sometimes flagellate myself for not keeping up enough with the news.

The last step

I did some errands with my dad today, including a trip to his bank. I remarked that I couldn’t even remember the last time I’d been inside a bank, since I pretty much do all my banking through ATMs. My dad, incredibly enough, does not know how to operate an ATM. He said someone showed him once and it seemed confusing.

So after he concluded his business, I decided to do him the favor of giving him a quick demo. And it went well and Dad saw how easy it was. The one question — “Where does the deposit envelope go?” — was handled with ease. But I forgot the last step. I didn’t realize it until I arrived home later, but that last step is crucial. Once your transaction is completed, Dad, remember to remove your ATM card!

Otherwise, the machine eats it and you’ve got to wait 10 business days for them to issue a new card. Argh. That’s the second time in the last few months that I’ve left my card in the machine. Maybe my dad has the right idea after all about not using ATMs.

Unreliable sources

In a fine story debunking some of the previously reported profits of porn companies, AlterNet’s Emanuelle Richard (link via InstaPundit) makes the mistake of relying on none other than Luke Ford as a supposedly reliable source. Richard concludes:

With the increased coverage, and the addition of porn beats at a handful of mainstream publications, the myths about the adult business are bound to give way to a more accurate picture. But, says Luke Ford, it might take a while.

“The media don’t catch the baloney, the lies, the true horror of this industry that you capture when you go on sets and you mix with the people, and you just see the cavalier way they deal with life,” Ford said. “Every one of these people lie. Everyone. They lie by habit. When their lips move, they’re saying lies — they can’t help it. … If the greatest reporter in the world decides to make porn his beat, it would still take him a year or two to get up to speed.”

Yeah, it’s a colorful quote, and I might have concluded my story the same way. But Luke Ford — who makes Matt Drudge look like Bob Woodward — is hardly the guy to talk about great reporting. Sure, he knows firsthand of the deviousness of many people in the porn industry, but he did his part to make reliable information about the porn industry hard to come by in reporting rumors, gossip and off-the-record conversations on his pseudo-news site.

He burned as many times as he was burned, and is not exactly the kind of disinterested observer you should turn to for a balanced view of what’s really going on in the industry. I guess Richard’s years of covering porn — on and off — did not teach her that much.