I feel sick

Help me, Jeebus!:

Mark Prior probably won’t pitch until May because of inflammation in his right Achilles tendon and a stiff elbow.

“I’d say May 1 or the first week of May is optimistic,” Chicago Cubs general manager Jim Hendry said Tuesday. “He’s a guy that I don’t think needs more than three or four weeks to get ready.”

The Cubs were hoping for a good outing Tuesday from Sergio Mitre, who will replace Prior in the starting rotation.

But Chicago gave up 19 hits in a 16-4 loss to the Seattle Mariners. Mitre allowed eight hits and five runs in four innings.

A stiff elbow? What?! And Mitre is far from a solid replacement, even for just a month. Nineteen hits? I just hope he was working on a new pitch or something.

I spoke in my last post about Prior’s long-term importance to the franchise, but he’s obviously crucial in the short-term as well. If May 1 is an optimistic return date, let’s write him off until May 15. That’s 40 games into the season, about eight missed starts.

Prior had a .750 winning percentage last season, and that’s not counting how the Cubs did in his games when he didn’t get a decision. So the Cubs, just based on the probabilities, would win six of those eight Prior starts.

No guy who gives up 19 hits in a spring training game is going to win six of eight starts. The Cubs will be very fortunate to win half of those games, and are likely to be sub-.500 in those starts. That’s three to four losses right there, assuming Prior comes back May 15 and is as good as new.

Given how close the Central race is likely to be, these games could very well make the difference between the Cubs and the Astros. Now, Dusty, does it still seem like it was a great idea to overuse Mark Prior last year?

I know I shouldn’t be freaking out

But I just can’t help it.

According to FootSmart (yeah, I know, great medical resource), the Achilles’ tendon in extreme cases could require surgery.

Achilles’ tendon pain is caused by such things as running and excessive walking. Excessive walking?! Jeebus, this could be a chronic problem plaguing Mark Prior’s entire career. I sure hope not, but it’s not outside the realm of possibility.

Prior is the future of this team. Period. How important is Prior to the franchise? The Cubs can contend without Prior making 35 starts or perhaps starting at less than full strength when he does return. They can win. They can win it all. This team has that much talent, and pitching is that important in the post-season.

But the Cubs want — and Cubs fans deserve — more than just a year of success, even if it brings a World Series (knock on Wood — and Prior!). They deserve to have a contender for a decade. They deserve, for Jeebus’ sake, the first back-to-back winning seasons since 1971-72! And Prior is more important than any other single player in helping to make that happen.

I hope, but I don’t expect, the Cubs to make it to the Series this year. I hope, but I don’t expect, that they’ll even make the playoffs. But I’ll be crushed if this injury to Prior continues to nag or turns out to be something much graver. And I just hope that the Cubs finish above .500.

You see, I’ve learned my lesson well. Comes from a lifetime of Cubs fandom. Set the bar low, and you’re bound to be pleased by the results.

Bobpost

I’ll take this opportunity to throw a few Bob Dylan-related program activities into one post.

It’s alright, ma (I’m just disappointed): I bought the “Masked and Anonymous” DVD and had the chance to watch the movie again the regular way, watch about a half dozen deleted scenes, and then watch the entire movie again with director Larry Charles’ commentary.

I’d already seen the movie twice in the theaters, so I can’t say that I really gleaned anything new from the third viewing. It was less impressive than it was on the big screen, and the overall suckiness of the project came through. I did enjoy being able to freeze frame the various scenes with lists of Dylan-related in-jokes, though even these were surprisingly pedestrian.

Having read the original script, I thought there might be a director’s cut of some kind because I was under the impression that the entire script had been shot. Instead, there are a handful of inconsequential and low-quality deleted scenes included. As for Charles’ commentary, it is entertaining, insightful and at times self-delusional.

He spends a good portion of it lamely attempting to defend the picture against the critical savaging it received. “They just didn’t get it,” he says.

I think there’s a lot to appreciate about the movie, especially for a Dylan fan, but I wouldn’t dare defend the proposition that it’s actually a good movie. The plot is a thin excuse to hold up a series of unconnected vignettes. The problem is that the vignettes aren’t very compelling on their own. The acting is pretty good across the board with the exception of Dylan, who for the most part is asked only to look moody and doesn’t even do that very convincingly.

But the lines the actors are required to perform make their job difficult. “M&A” is the equivalent of one of Bob’s mid-’80s albums: brilliant in spots, but a disappointment overall. The biggest disappointment I have about the DVD, however, is that it did not include any bonus performance footage. The most compelling portions of the film, naturally, are when Dylan performs with his band.

The band crowds close around Dylan so that they could all be squeezed into the same shot. No cutting, no panning, no nothing. The camera just watches the band play. It’s really awesome stuff. According to Charles, Dylan and his band wer filmed performing 22 songs over the course of two days. Great!

Where are those 22 songs? Except for a small clip of “Standing in the Doorway” in one of the deleted scenes, there’s no extra music anywhere on the DVD. The soundtrack includes complete versions of the songs that appeared in the movie — “Down in the Flood,” “Diamond Joe,” “Dixie” and “Cold Irons Bound” — and those performances are oustanding. An extra disc with just straight up unedited footage of those 22 songs would have made this DVD an absolute must-have. It’s really a missed opportunity.

Sometimes I wanna take to the road and plunder: My dad and I recently saw Dylan five times in three cities in less than two weeks, starting on March 1 in St. Louis and finishing up March 12 in Milwaukee.

All in all, the shows were good but not great. It appears a health problem is limiting Dylan to the piano, and he’s not a very good piano player. But it keeps him engaged with the music. There were some great performances and some not so great ones. With Dylan it’s always hit and miss. The best show was probably Sunday, March 7, at the Vic Theatre in Chicago.

Each venue was relatively small — none was larger than 3,000 capacity, I think — and it made for an unforgettable set of pretty intimate concerts. Now if he’ll only play Old Town!

So long, it’s been good to know yuh

Disproving those who insist that copy editors can’t write, Tribune sports copy editor Richard Rothschild rightly mourns ESPN radio’s loss of Tony Kornheiser.

Instead of turning up the volume on a sports topic or personality, ESPN Radio’s Kornheiser and Patrick provided illumination and perspective. Sure, they sometimes grew a little hot under the collar, but the two hosts both approached sports with a spirit of play that the subject requires.

Alas, no more. Last year WMVP replaced the final hour of Kornheiser’s show and the first hour of Patrick’s program with two hours of blowhard Jim Rome, whose syndicator paid the station so he could get on the air in Chicago.

Earlier this year Kornheiser disappeared entirely from Chicago radio when WMVP opted for local programming between 9 and 11 a.m. (As if Chicago needed yet another local sports radio show.)

And by the end of March, Kornheiser will be gone from national radio altogether.

I’ll miss Kornheiser’s radio show. He was funny and made it a priority to talk to sportswriters around the country to get a better scoop on what was happening in the sports world, instead of relying on contentless interviews with big-name athletes.

The formula for so much sports talk radio is to whine endlessly about whatever and then kiss up mercilessly when any athlete or sports mogul is interviewed on air. Boring!

But it’s not as if Kornheiser’s disappearing. He’ll still be on the ESPN’s slightly entertaining talk show, “Pardon the Interruption” as well as the irritating “Dream Job.”

Blair Hull’s worst sin? A bad ROI

Blair Hull, the Illinois Democratic senatorial candidate cokehead wifebeater with no qualifications for the job and a pocketful of cash, spent $29 million of his own money and wound up netting just under 11 percent of the vote.

The raw number is actually 133,274 votes. Hull spent $217.59 per vote! Talk about a poor return on your investment.

In a larger sense, though, I wonder what kind of ego a person must possess to believe that — knowing he has a shady past, no experience and no ideas — he could or should win his party’s nomination for U.S. Senate. What a disgusting waste of money. The principal issue Hull demagogued emphasized was the cost of prescription drugs. Many of his inescapable TV ads showed him taking a bus full of seniors into Canada to buy price-controlled medicine there.

Instead of wasting his money on an ego-trip — not to suggest that Illinoisans won’t cherish his campaign’s numerous flyers for years to come — Hull could have used that $30 million to seed a charitable foundation to help needy seniors to buy life-saving prescription drugs. Instead he wasted it trying to win power and glory for himself, so he could agitate to force everyone else to pay for seniors’ drugs whether they need the help or not.

I’m a little more sympathetic to career politicians with bad ideas. Most politicians’ ideas are bad but hey — gotta talk about somethin’, right? It’s not like they have the talent or inclination to do anything productive with their lives. It’s kind of a self-selecting process. We segregate the useless into the political class. What’s even more alarming is when people who’ve actually had successful careers in the private sector consciously decide to enter politics, especially if they’re looking to grow government power rather than shrink it.

Most politicians have some kind of congenital defect that forces them into the field. In that respect, they’re relatively blameless. We don’t blame jockeys for being short. But the mid-career political novices like Hull are more analogous to somebody who chops his legs in half to become a jockey — obviously deranged.

Grave and gathering stupidity

I am getting so fed up with the hawks’ tireless insistence that Dubya & Co. never claimed that Iraq presented an “imminent threat.”

Let’s assume for a moment that it’s true that they didn’t in so many words — or so many others — use that line of argument. To me the natural follow-up question is this: Should U.S. foreign policy post-9/11 be putting the overwhelming majority of its intellectual, human, physical and financial resources into fighting a threat that is not imminent?

You can say a lot of things about 9/11, but it sure as hell showed that Al Qaeda was not just an imminent threat, but a proven threat. Why was it wise to drain resources from that effort?

Might the folks who died in the Bali, Istanbul, Riyadh and Madrid attacks be alive today if Dubya & Co. just stuck to the game plan? It’s impossible to know. But if they’re to get credit for Iraq, they should get some portion of the blame for those tragic events.

A reason to vote

 tribvote

The above image is from the Chicago Tribune’s home page today and unintentionally says a great deal about what’s wrong with politics in America today … but that’s not what this post is about.

As usual, Illinois will play the crucial presidential primary role of being completely irrelevant, so even if I were a Democrat I’d have little reason to vote today, except to choose between a bunch of subpar U.S. senatorial candidates.

And yet, a glimmer of hope pierces the darkness of this election day — I have the opportunity use my vote as an ironic gesture.

You see, there’s a Nimrod running for office. “Aren’t they all?” you rightly ask.

Yes, they are, but this time there’s an actual Nimrod running for office: Timothy D. Nimrod is running for a judgeship in the Cook County Circuit Court’s 9th Judicial Subcircuit Court.

Vote Nimrod, nimrod

Here’s a guy whose rulings will get overturned a lot. What appellate court’s going to be skittish about overturning a Judge Nimrod decision? But hey, Lodge #7 of the Chicago Fraternal Order of Police endorsed him! So he must be all right.

Should I walk the 20 feet to my polling place to register my ironic support for Candidate Nimrod? I think I’d be a nimrod not to.

Don’t these spics know how to fix an election?

Judging by some of the comments from the hawk crowd, the victory in Spain of the anti-Iraq war party is ipso facto a victory for Al Qaeda.

The hawks continue to conflate Iraq and Al Qaeda, mistaking Spaniards’ reasonable desire to do what little they can to remove themselves from the line of fire with weakness in the face of terrorism.

It may be true that there can be no appeasing Al Qaeda — if that’s who in fact was behind the March 11 attacks in Madrid — but the Spaniards seem to have made the eminently sensible decision that there was no point in continuing to participate in a war that brought no tangible benefits in the war on terror — since, you know, it was a diversion from it! — but may have exacted a terrible, terrible price.

But you know what? Screw those Spics. Now the Russkies know how to run things. Their guy, another Friend of Dubya, got re-elected with no trouble at all. Why can’t they all be like Putin? Or better yet, like Bush Buddy Pervez Musharraf, the wonderful Pakistani dictator friendly with Islamic extremists whose top nuclear scientist sold secrets to half the globe.

Anyway, Putin came into office on the strength of his tough-on-terror reputation. And, naturally, he was re-elected by a suspiciously overwhelming margin because the Chechen terror threat has been completely vanquished.

Right?

What’s worse? Re-electing someone in spite of the fact that their policies have not done one damn bit of good in actually stopping terrorist attacks, or deciding instead to choose an alternate route?

I’ll take the Spics’ so-called appeasement anyday.

UPDATE: The first and last word on this should really be Julian Sanchez’s fine essay at Reason Online.

If you’re for big gummint, at least advertise it!

Democratic “message adviser” Mark Penn makes a good point in this New Republic piece about Dubya’s first series of campaign ads:

The point of early advertising is not to reinforce your positives; it’s to plug holes in your negatives. … The issues that Americans care most about today are the ones where the president is weakest — the economy and health care. But rather than try to address this weakness, Bush seems content to avoid it.

Dubya, to the chagrin of advocates of limited government, has pushed or at least signed into law a series of big-government measures (as Tim Lee, to pick one of many, has pointed out), and yet he’s already falling back on tax cuts and strong defense as his core issues.

Subsidizing agribusiness, enacting protective tarriffs on behalf of steel companies, limiting political speech, federalizing education policy, pork-barrelling the transportation budget and vastly expanding Medicare may not be my cup of tea, but it’s the kind of crap Dubya’s signed off on for political purposes, presumably.

And now the political season has rolled around, and these “accomplishments” are nowhere to be seen in the Bush ads. Penn points out how adeptly Clinton used his administration’s support for additional federal death penalties and handing out dough to local police departments to cultivate a strong-on-crime image.

It’s well known that politicians often pass laws not in the public’s long-term interest but in their own short-term political interest. That’s about the only explanation for much of Dubya’s terrible domestic “agenda” — if such a word can be used for a policy of signing every piece of crap that comes across your desk.

And yet Rove & Co. don’t appear to be using this stuff to gain any kind of political advantage. So Dubya & Co. appear to not only be willing to depart from smaller government whenever it appears to suit their political purposes, but they are too incompetent to even follow up politically on those departures.

Once again this question occurs to any reasonable observer: Are these folks evil, or are they just stupid?

I ponder with dread the answer.

IJ, you J, we all J for IJ

In case you were curious, yes, Insurance Journal is still publishing. IJ Midwest has been going well so far, though it’s a lot more work than I was doing before. It’s been a challenge, definitely.

Here’s a link to the Feb. 23 issue of IJ Midwest online, and here’s one for the March 8 issue. I’ve been busy working on a couple of longer stories that will appear in upcoming issues, so there’s not much by me in either of these issues, aside from the little editor’s note.

I did write a couple of news stories, though. One about a group of state legislators specializing in insurance affairs that moved to password-protect its Web site, much to chagrin of the self-appointed consumer representatives. And a second story concerns a Missouri insurance department study that claims to show that the practice of using credit scores in rating and underwriting discriminates against minorities and the poor.

Enjoy!

They never thought it would happen in their little town

You may have heard that veteran actor Paul Winfield died last Sunday of a heart attack. He was 62, and was best known for a number of outsanding TV roles. But in the various obits I’ve seen, there’s nary a mention of his greatest accomplishment.

Winfield was the voice of A&E’s “City Confidential.” If you’ve ever watched an episode of the show, you know that it’s his voice that makes the otherwise humdrum “big murder in a small town” show so addictive, not to mention soporific.

A&E knows the score:

All of us at A&E Network were saddened to learn of the death of Paul Winfield. Paul was an extraordinary performer and a consummate professional. His distinct voice and sense of humor contributed so much to our critically acclaimed series “City Confidential.” We express our deepest sympathy to his family. Paul will be missed.

Posters to the show’s discussion board are devastated, and calling for A&E to honor the actor with a “Biography” special. On an old interview with “Fresh Air” that was replayed today, the first question Terry Gross asked was about Winfield’s voice.

Amazingly, he said he wasn’t very pleased with it. “I wish I had a deeper voice like James Earl Jones,” he said. On that basis, it seems to me that Jones is the only suitable replacement for Winfield as narrator of the show, though perhaps the “Autopsy” lady — Marlene Sanders — might be an interesting choice.