Organized people and organized money means superpower

A very good Tribune investigative story by Andy Martin & Co. about the Hispanic Democratic Organization. The nut of it:

HDO has amassed a roster estimated at more than 1,000 members using the same techniques that helped the mayor’s father, the late Mayor Richard J. Daley, build a massive patronage army: raising money for favored candidates, swarming precincts on Election Day to get out the vote, and, some members say, doling out city jobs and promotions to friends, relatives and campaign workers.

Handing out city jobs to political workers was deemed illegal by a federal court decades ago, an order that became known as the Shakman decree. The Daley administration is currently arguing Shakman is no longer required because the city’s hiring practices are so fair.

Yet about 500 of HDO’s members are city workers, mostly employed in departments where HDO lieutenants hold high-ranking posts, according to an analysis of city records by the Chicago Tribune and Exito!

No big surprise, of course. Everyone knows that, among other things, the key to Daley’s political success has been the white-Hispanic alliance he’s forged. Hand out enough city jobs and you’ll find plenty of votes, even among supposedly oppressed minority groups.

And ultimately for Hispanics, when it comes to choosing between throwing their fate in with the white ethnics like Daley versus blacks like Bobby Rush, it’s an easy choice.

An anti-war rallying cry that might just work

If you’re tired of all Vietnam-era relics and anti-free trade, pro-Mumia folks you see at anti-war rallies nowadays, well maybe it’s time to take a new approach. So says Mikel Reparaz:

As I sat pondering the President’s motives one day, it suddenly dawned on me that it is entirely likely our Commander in Chief has never played a single video game in his life. “Of course!” I exclaimed, startling my girlfriend, who was driving at the time. “Without the catharsis that video games provide, Bush has no way of fulfilling his militaristic fantasies other than actually fighting wars.”

Absolutely true. So Reparaz began the Buy Bush a PlayStation 2 Campaign. As he explains, it’s been a smashing success. More than enough money’s been raised to buy the PlayStation. Now the campaign is raising money for an extra controller for Cheney to use and a copy of “Conflict: Desert Storm,” a tactical shooter game in which the goal is to kill Saddam Hussein.

Versus the machine

Stephanie Sailor, the Libertarian candidate in my congressional district has won her battle in court against Cook Count Clerk David Orr to have her name printed on the ballot as Stephanie “Vs. the Machine” Sailor.

Orr may still appeal but it seems to be a done deal now. I look forward to voting for her. I wonder if the nickname will make any difference in the vote total. It doesn’t seem very likely. It’s amusing, nonetheless. And you better find it funny, or Sailor will bust a cap in yo ass.

TSA is a joke

A man bolted past O’Hare security guards Tuesday night. The United terminal was evacuated and two planes were delayed two hours while passengers were scrutinized by police dogs.

Here’s the kicker: “‘Oddly enough, they didn’t supposedly see the person, which is very disturbing,’ said Isaac Richardson, the Transportation Security Administration’s chief at O’Hare.”

Oddly enough, federalizing airport security was an idiotic idea. Does anyone doubt that the screeners who let this happen will not be punished, let alone fired?

Those wacky Libertarians

Old Chicago LP buddy Matt Beauchamp is finally breaking through the big media lockout in his race to unseat Jesse White as Secretary of State. He’s the star of Sun-Times columnist Mark Brown’s story today, generously headlined, “Ranting ‘gun nut’ shoots himself in the foot.”

Brown had written a column excoriating the Illinois State Rifle Association for speculating in its newsletter that gun-control advocates might be behind the sniper attacks in the D.C. area. An easy target, but certainly worthwhile. Brown then wrote a column about Officer Benjamin Perez, who was killed by a commuter train during a drug stakeout but is not being honored by the Chicago Police Department. Luckily, Beauchamp did us all the favor of writing an e-mail to Brown, who quotes the whole thing in his column. And we’ll do the same here:

First off, your column yesterday was highly insulting to gun owners. I have owned guns for years, can correctly spell NRA and probably have a much better education than you. Furthermore, the NRA is hardly the group of choice anymore–they are far too liberal and willing to hand over gun rights than, say, the Gun Owners of America or the 2nd Amendment Foundation, or even Conceal Carry Inc. right here in Illinois.

Funny how you idolize the cops (who carry guns)–blubbering over ‘fallen heroes’ like Benjamin Perez or recounting your scary day at the police academy. So it’s OK for cops to carry guns, but not me? I’m sure your answer will be ‘but they’re trained to shoot.’ Alright, how about this: I’ll make a wager with you right now (knowing that you’re too big a pussy to take it). Pull one random name from a list of cops who have been on the force for over five years, and I’ll compete against him at the gun range. I’ll bet you $500 I’m a better shot.

As for your hero Perez getting his number retired, here’s the truth: Perez is a klutz who fell onto a railroad track while watching suspected drug dealers. If drugs were legal, this never would have happened. Any cop who dies in that fashion has no sympathy from me. People should be free to treat their bodies as they like–eat fatty foods (you certainly look like you indulge in this one, Mark), smoke cigarettes, joints, snort blow, whatever. When the government comes in and decides they know best–well, I can’t get too teary-eyed when they lost one of their own trying to enforce idiotic laws.

Good day to you, sir.

The rest of the column writes itself, of course. But you’ve got to hand it to Beauchamp. In the space of only a few paragraphs, he managed to: (1) Admit he was more extremist than the NRA, (2) insult a dead police officer and his family, (3) brag about his shooting capabilities, and (4) praise drug use.

I guess he got his name in the paper, and that might be all that matters to him. Brown went on to actually plug Beauchamp’s campaign Web site, where he touts his plan to give drivers their license in 15 minutes or charge them nothing. His ideas for reform aren’t bad and his site uses humor effectively.

Beauchamp re-energized the Chicago LP and is a smart guy with flair. But he is clearly out to just make noise, not make a difference. Sometimes the two are the same, but in this case Beauchamp badly misjudged what the public has a tolerance for. And it’s guys like him I have to explain away when I tell people I’m a libertarian.

Congressmen introduce anti-andro bill

The crusade to outlaw performance-enhancing drugs continues. I think there are perfectly valid reasons for organized sports to forbid use of these drugs. They upset the ideal of competitive balance and arguably ratchet up the pressure on athletes to improve performance at the expense of their long-term health.

But giving these good intentions the force of law is a different story. It should come as no surprise that one of the co-sponsors of the legislation is former University of Nebraska head football coach Tom Osborne. But once andro is illegal, athletes looking to take a short cut to the top will find that if they are already breaking the law, there’s no reason not to skip right over andro straight to anabolic steroids, whose deleterious effects are much more well known and pretty much beyond debate.

The Olympics rules committee, the NCAA, and professional sports have a perfect right to make rules regarding what substances they allow players to use. But stretching those rules to cover the whole of society is to overstep their bounds and use government to punish people for bad judgment. If sports as a collective want to engage in a crusade against andro — through random testing, education, whatever — that’s fine. But leave the rest of America alone. The last thing we need is another illegal drug on the streets.

Press coverage

This story by Eric Krol in the Daily Herald highlights some of the work we’ve done researching campaign contributions to the Illinois gubernatorial by O’Hare contractors.

Surprise, surprise — Democrat Rod Blagojevich, who is gung-ho for expansion, is receiving eight times as much in contributions and O’Hare-related donors make up 8 percent of his total take. Then again, he’s raised a lot more money than Ryan to begin with. And he’ll win. The question is whether he’ll give Daley a headache by asking for a piece of the action at an expanded O’Hare.

Of course, Blagojevich’s biggest mistake — at least as far as entertainment value goes — is forsaking what should be his campaign slogan: “In Rod We Trust.”

Patrick Corcoran of the Elk Grove Times wrote a very favorable piece about our report, “The O’Hare Scandal: Hijacking the System.” I’m even mentioned in the story — undeservedly so, of course. What’s funny is that two people who’ve been with AIP since the beginning (Bryan Doyle and Drew Adamek) had their names misspelled, while I — the newcomer — had his name spelled perfectly. Fortune smiles upon me.

Operation Waste of Time

A nice story by Michael Trackett in the Tribune unveils what Attorney General John Ashcroft’s Operation Flytrap accomplished. It mucked up the lives of hundreds of people who had no connection to terrorist groups and were guilty of nothing more than fudging a little bit to get jobs.

Naturally, Ashcroft had a big press conference to take credit for his
wonderful work. “Our response has been to weave a web of terrorism prevention that brings together all agencies of justice and every level of law enforcement,” Ashcroft said in April. “Let me be clear — there will be zero tolerance of security breaches at our nation’s airports.” Aw, that’s super. I just can’t wait when we have a whole cabinet-level department devoted to this kind of nonsense.

You so crazy!

Another excellent column from Steve Chapman on Hussein’s purported madness. Chapman goes back and shows how what now seem like irrational moves (war with Iran, invading Kuwait) at the time seemed necessary for survival and not at all crazy. Further, when his survival was very much in doubt during the Gulf War, Hussein still refrained from using the weapons of mass destruction he possessed at the time.

Why would it be different this time around? More generally, how un-crazy does a person have to be to realize that going nuclear with the United States is a very, very bad idea? A bare grasp on reality seems to be the only requirement.

Homeland security or job security?

In case you needed any more evidence that the Homeland Security Department is a giant sinkhole in the making, just look at what’s keeping Tom Ridge from
getting his own shiny new cabinet chair. Congress and the president have been arguing for weeks about job rules. Job rules!

And we think this 170,000-person monstrosity is somehow going to help secure the homeland? Let’s drop this sucker while we still can.