New ED drama? Hospitals demand upfront fee for nonemergencies

Physicians who take after-hours calls from patients often face a difficult decision: Which symptoms can wait for an office visit, and which ones require a trip to the emergency department? Now doctors find these decisions complicated by a troubling, rising trend: Will a trip to the ED mean an upfront charge for a patient if the problem is deemed nonemergent?

My latest front-page story. Read the whole-shebang.

Call for flu-shot mandate in long-term care setting

Honolulu Physicians and other workers who have direct contact with patients in long-term-care settings should be required to get the influenza immunization annually, said the American Medical Association House of Delegates. Workers who have medical contraindications or religious objections should be exempt from the vaccine requirement, said the policy adopted at the Association’s Interim Meeting.

“Many health care organizations now have mandatory immunization,” said internist Eric Tangalos, MD, a delegate from Rochester, Minn., who spoke on behalf of the American Medical Directors Assn., which proposed the policy. “It saves lives, saves money and keeps people on the job. And with regard to [this resolution], we’re talking about protecting the most frail, most vulnerable population of patients.”

My latest. Read the whole shebang.

Patient satisfaction: When a doctor’s judgment risks a poor rating

Family physician and addiction medicine specialist Aleksandra Zgierska, MD, PhD, often treats patients referred to her by primary care colleagues concerned about their patients’ growing reliance on opioid analgesics.

Caring for these patients raises clinical questions that even the most skilled physicians have trouble answering. But recently, Dr. Zgierska has considered another question as she wonders how to proceed with treatment: Will using her best medical judgment harm her patient-satisfaction rating?

“If I feel the patient is not an appropriate candidate for opioids, I should say no,” she says. “But in the back of my mind, the question can arise, ‘What will the patient do with that?’ Especially since the No. 1 question on our patient-satisfaction survey is, ‘Are you happy with the way the physician treated your pain?’ ”

My latest feature article. Read the whole shebang.

Few clinical guideline panels follow financial-conflict standards

Clinical guideline developers are not adhering to standards on minimizing financial conflicts, increasing transparency and explaining the evidence used to make their recommendations, according to an Archives of Internal Medicine study.

Fewer than half of the 114 guidelines randomly sampled from the National Guideline Clearinghouse met most of the “standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines” set forth by an Institute of Medicine committee in March 2011. The typical guideline met 44% of the IOM standards, said the study, published Oct. 22. For example, the IOM said panel chairs and co-chairs should not have financial conflicts. More than 70% of guideline panel chairs listed a financial conflict, and more than 90% of co-chairs had a conflict.

My latest. Read the whole shebang.

Rise in extreme obesity creates new level of treatment complexity

More than one-third of U.S. adults are obese. If current trends continue, no state will have an obesity rate lower than 44% by 2030, according to September estimates by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Trust for America’s Health.

As clinically challenging as it is for primary doctors to treat obese patients — defined as those with a body mass index of 30 or higher — the problem is compounded when caring for patients with morbid obesity. These are patients with a BMI greater than 40, and their numbers are growing rapidly.

In 2000, 3.9% of U.S. adults had a BMI of 40 or greater. By 2010, the figure grew to 6.55%, said a study published Sept. 18 in the International Journal of Obesity.

My latest. Read the whole shebang.

Hospitals urged to end punitive responses to error reports

The leaders of U.S. hospitals need to spearhead changes to encourage physicians and other health professionals to report the quality and safety problems they witness, said a report released in October.

The “call to action” was issued by the National Assn. for Healthcare Quality, which represents more than 10,000 professionals worldwide who are charged with administering hospital quality measurement and adverse-event reporting programs.

My latest. Read the whole shebang.

More than half of hospitals don’t screen all ICU patients for MRSA

The majority of hospitals are eschewing aggressive, time-consuming and costly interventions that might help prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Forty percent of infection-control directors said their intensive care units screen all newly admitted patients for multidrug-resistant organisms, according to a study in the October American Journal of Infection Control. About 30% of ICUs do such screening periodically, said the study, based on a nationwide survey of infection-control directors at 250 hospitals operating 413 ICUs.

My latest. Read the whole shebang.

Comparative effectiveness research faces obstacles in changing how doctors practice

The comparative effectiveness research program that is getting $3.5 billion in federal funding through 2019 under the Affordable Care Act aims to deliver actionable information to help physicians and patients decide among competing treatment options.

That money is meant to fix what many experts see as a market failure. To get Food and Drug Administration approval, pharmaceutical companies need not demonstrate that their drug is superior to others already approved. Once drugs and other treatments are available on the market, there is little financial incentive for companies to fund expensive studies that may show their option is inferior.

Yet an analysis of high-profile comparison trials during the past decade suggests that a lack of funding for comparative research has not been the only obstacle to using top-flight evidence to shape patient care. Even when they contradict prevailing practice, comparative effectiveness studies often fail to translate into substantial changes in patient care, said a study in the October issue of Health Affairs.

My latest. Read the whole shebang.

Misconduct accounts for most journal retractions

The rate of article retractions in the biomedical and life-sciences literature has risen tenfold in the last 35 years. Most retractions are due to fraud, plagiarism and other misconduct, said a study published online Oct. 1 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The proliferation of journals and the intense competition for research grants and academic tenure may be contributing to the growing problem, experts said. Along with continuing concerns about researchers’ financial relationships with industry, the rise of scientific misconduct adds yet another reason for practicing physicians to scrutinize carefully what they read in medical journals, they added.

My latest. Read the whole shebang.

Doctors cast skeptical eye on pharma-backed studies

Physicians are deeply suspicious of industry-funded randomized clinical trials, even when they are of high methodological rigor, according to recently published findings.

The study, which appeared in the Sept. 20 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, comes amid efforts by leading pharmaceutical companies to close what they see as a “credibility gap” faced by industry-sponsored research. The study’s authors and other experts argue that high-profile controversies such as misleading and selectively reported trial data related to Merck’s Vioxx (rofecoxib) and GlaxoSmithKline’s Avandia (rosiglitazone) have made physicians more doubtful of pharma-sponsored studies.

My latest. Read the whole shebang.