New coalition sets health quality priorities

The lede:

Despite intense focus on improving care and keeping patients safe from harm, American health care quality is only about 2% better this decade than last, according to the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. That is just not good enough, say leaders of a major new initiative aimed at coordinating quality improvement and patient safety efforts among physicians, hospitals, accreditation and certification bodies, health plans, payers and patients.

The initiative is known as the National Priorities Partnership (www.nationalprioritiespartnership.org). It was launched in November by the National Quality Forum, a voluntary standards-setting body that convened 28 national organizations to work together to cut unnecessary care and improve quality and patient safety.

The whole shebang.

Judge adds Montana to assisted suicide crowd

The lede:

For 10 years, Oregon stood alone as the state with a legal physician-assisted suicide process. But two other states now allow the practice.

Washington voters in November 2008 passed a ballot initiative legalizing aid in dying. Then in December 2008, Montana Judge Dorothy McCarter ruled that state homicide laws unconstitutionally restrict terminally ill patients’ right to dignified deaths.

The whole shebang.

Data-mining is not free speech, says federal court

The lede:

A federal appeals court ruling that upheld New Hampshire’s ban on commercial use of prescribing data could clear the way for other states to pursue legislation restricting drugmakers’ access to information they use to tailor marketing pitches to doctors.

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in November found that the 2006 New Hampshire law did not violate the First Amendment, overturning a lower court ruling. The court’s three-judge panel rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the law prohibited free flow of information.

The judges said the law regulates conduct, not speech, and the state had presented evidence to show that prescribing data was used to fine-tune drug reps’ marketing pitches for higher-cost, brand-name drugs that were not always more efficacious.

“While the plaintiffs lip-synch the mantra of promoting the free flow of information, the lyrics do not fit the tune,” wrote U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Bruce M. Selya in his opinion.

The whole shebang.

Pondering placebos

The lede:

Doctors know there’s little clinical value in prescribing medications that won’t work. But that doesn’t keep patients from asking for them.

Mitchell Kahn, MD, knows this struggle. The Bellingham, Wash., internist prefers to talk patients through their problems and offer therapeutic reassurance. But the reality is that days are long, time is short and sometimes, he said, patient demands just wear you down.

Dr. Kahn is not alone. Patients who demand antibiotics for the common cold or ask their doctors to recommend vitamins are found frequently in physician exam rooms. They present doctors with an ethical dilemma: When all else fails, is it OK to harness the power of the placebo effect, and what should patients be told?

According to a British Medical Journal study, more than half of American physicians regularly recommend treatments aimed primarily at achieving a placebo effect.

The whole shebang.

Link rot

Information overload — news overload, to be more precise — can be a problem, though it is a wonderful problem to have.

The main reason people read “the news” — is to satisfy a general sense of obligation to “know what’s going on.” It is to avoid that terrible sense of embarrassment you might feel if you had no idea what a co-worker was talking about when she asked, “Can you believe what those monsters did in Mumbai?”

This need, as well as the desire to follow news of deep personal interest such as how your favorite stock or sports team is doing, used to be easily satisfied by reading the daily newspaper. Now that you could probably spend hours a day researching your stock or your sports team, the question of when enough is enough is highly pertinent. Each new link seems to ask, “Do you want more information?” How do you think about answering that question? How can news organizations help you decide the answer to that question?

Daniel Luzer attempts to take on the issue in a piece for the Columbia Journalism Review called “Linked Out.” The gist:

In mid-October, I decided to spend a day following the news through hyperlinks only. I followed every link I could find. I stuffed myself full of news to understand the potential and problems of the hyperlink. How much does the hyperlink matter? Is it an incidental addition to news, or does it actually change the way people consume information?

To describe this approach as conceptually stillborn would be polite. To describe it as idiotic and moronic would be impolite, but perhaps more apt. The methodology is akin to studying urban sprawl by randomly taking every highway off ramp for a day or consumerism by walking into every store on a street. It is a pointless gimmick that does not in any way resemble how real people behave, or tell us anything useful about the subject at hand.

Really difficult syndication

So, I’ve come to your Web site. Looks interesting. No, I’m not going to bookmark it, because then I’d have to remember (1) where I bookmarked it and (2) to click on the bookmark. What I’d love to do is add your RSS feed to my news aggregator of choice. But why do so many news sites make that a daunting prospect?

For example, I’ve heard good things about the pro-am/citizen journalism Web site, Chi-Town Daily News. But check out the RSS page.  There are more than 20 feed options, and not a one of them is a general site feed or “top news” or “top headlines” or “front page” or whatever. And worse, many of the feeds carry vague titles such as “Thesis 11” and “Reality of my surroundings.” So, which feed do I subscribe to?

Gapers Block is another Chicago news site guilty of the same sin. No general or “top news” or “main” feed. And would you have guessed the “Mechanics” feed covers politics, not auto repair? Yeah, me neither. (That should not be confused, of course, with “Transmission,” which covers music.) Site editor Andrew Huff says there is some sort of technical hurdle to providing a general site feed. I take him at his word, but that doesn’t make it any less irritating.

Don’t get me wrong: I love the fact that I can subscribe to the Boston Globe’s Celtics and Red Sox coverage without getting the rest of its news content. But check out how logical the Globe’s RSS feeds page is. There are ways of doing this well.

Sites should make syndication quick, easy and intuitive. Is that too much to ask?

By the way, Russ Smith’s new Web site, Splice Today, does something I find odd for this Web day and age. It prominently asks users to “make Splice your home page.” Isn’t that awfully presumptuous for a brand new Web site? Most users are already attached to a page that’s been their starting site for a while, often years. It’s sort of like someone proposing marriage on the first date.

Update: Chi-Town Daily News head honcho Geoff Dougherty tells me the all-news feed shows up in the “subscribe to this page” option now available in many Web browsers’ URL bars (not mine, however). Nevertheless, the RSS feeds page still could use some clarity given that many users are interested in drilling down to more specific syndication options.

Primary care shortage a primary concern

The lede:

The lack of access to primary care doctors leads to worse health outcomes and higher costs, according to an American College of Physicians report released in November and aimed at influencing the shape of impending health system reform. As the population ages and demands on health services increase, Americans will find it more difficult to locate primary care physicians to help coordinate care in a fragmented system.

The 63-page ACP white paper reviews more than 100 studies from the last 20 years and concludes that the proportion of primary care doctors in a community is related to population health outcomes and system costs. The number of U.S. medical graduates entering residences in family medicine and internal medicine has dropped by half in the last decade as physicians pursue less time-squeezed and higher-paying specialties, the ACP report said.

The report comes amid signs from Capitol Hill that politicians are taking the work force shortage seriously.

The whole shebang.